The New York Times
The Washington Post
USA Today
San Jose Mercury News
CBS This Morning

Arbitration Agreements and Limiting Rights to Sue

Arbitration AgreementWhen downloading the most popular app in the country right now, Pokémon Go, users are presented with the app’s “terms of service,” which they must accept in order to download the app and play the mobile game. Most people just click “accept” on the lengthy “terms of service” agreements that often accompany the download of a new app or game without really reading the fine print. Most people do not think the terms will ever really matter, or that they have a choice in accepting if they want the product. However, not reading some of the important terms can result in giving up important rights. Included in the “terms of service” agreement for Pokémon Go is an arbitration clause.

What is Arbitration?

In accepting the “terms of service,” a person accepting the arbitration clause agrees to limit any dispute resolution arising out of the use of the app to arbitration. Arbitration is a dispute resolution process in which a third party hears the dispute outside the court judicial process and issues a binding decision. Courts are often required to uphold arbitration agreements between consumers and companies pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act.

This means that, with the exception of small claims court cases, any user who has a claim against the makers of Pokémon Go must submit to binding arbitration and cannot sue in court and have his case heard by a jury. A user who does not opt out of the arbitration agreement would also not be able to join other users in a class action lawsuit against the game makers.

Settlement awards received through arbitration are usually a fraction of what a consumer with a valid claim would receive before a jury, and can be limited in amount by language included in the rest of the agreement. There are generally no awards for punitive damages in arbitration. Arbitration can also cost the person bringing a claim a substantial amount of money in upfront fees. While the Pokémon Go arbitration agreement notes that the companies behind the game would meet some of the costs, this is limited to claims under $75,000.

While arbitration may be beneficial in some disputes, it is rarely so in a consumer context. Therefore, it is advisable that is a person has a chance to opt out of an arbitration they do so within the required time. For Pokémon Go players, this is within 30 days of accepting the “terms of service.”

Contact Us for Legal Assistance

If you have suffered a personal injury and are considering a settlement or other dispute resolution avenues that do not lead to a court case, contact an experienced personal injury attorney before making a decision in order to discuss the best way to ensure you receive the compensation to which you are entitled. For a free consultation, contact the skilled San Jose personal injury attorneys at Corsiglia, McMahon & Allard, L.L.P., serving Santa Clara County, San Mateo County, Monterey County, Alameda County, San Benito County, and the Bay Area. Our attorneys are prepared to help you immediately.

Client Reviews
I absolutely cannot speak highly enough of CMA Law, particularly of Mr. McMahon, with whom I have had the most experience. My entire family and I trusted CMA with our case following a significant and life-altering vehicle accident, and to say they delivered is putting it lightly. They were reachable & personable at every stage of this arduous, complex, and scary process, made things easier at every stage, inspired us with confidence, and delivered results. If you're looking for a law firm to place the trust of you in your family in, look absolutely no further than CMA - this is your firm. Declan O.
I suffered a severe spinal injury while working as a farm mechanic in the Salinas Valley. The attorneys -Tim McMahon and Mark Sigala were fantastic from the beginning. They fought for me over 3 long years and in the end, we won a difficult liability case against the farm company who was using dangerous equipment. The defendants in the case tried everything to put the blame on me and even claimed I was their employee in order to avoid civil responsibility. Tim and Mark never gave up on me and my case. I cannot recommend them highly enough. They are fighters. Adrian A.
Best Law Firms
American Board of Trial Advocates
2010 Street Fighter of The Year Award Finalists
Irish Legal 100
The Best Lawyers in America
Santa Clara County Bar
Super Lawyers
The National Trial Lawyers
California Lawyer
Top One
Santa Clara County Trial Lawyers Association
Public Justice Trial Lawyer of The Year